<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linux Coverage on Ars Technica</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hpoom.co.uk/2007/07/linux-coverage-on-ars-technica/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hpoom.co.uk/2007/07/linux-coverage-on-ars-technica/</link>
	<description>The personal and technical blog of Simon Wood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:54:36 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: hpoom</title>
		<link>http://www.hpoom.co.uk/2007/07/linux-coverage-on-ars-technica/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>hpoom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 18:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hpoom.co.uk/viewPost/75/Linux-Coverage-on-Ars-Technica.htm#comment-77</guid>
		<description>This can only be good news. Ars Technica has lacked coverage of open source software and Linux for too long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This can only be good news. Ars Technica has lacked coverage of open source software and Linux for too long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

